Not again? Yep. Again.

Here I go again, stumbling on another load of excellent garden fertilizer:http://autoimmunityresearch.org/science/ What sort of science is this? Uh-oh, I'm thinking osteomalacia, rickets..all leading back down the slime trail to-You guessed it-http://www.marshallprotocol.com/. Imagine that! This Marshall sure has done a masterful marketing campaign. Mix the unreal with the real- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10334980- and stir just to the right consistency. Voila! Perfect fertilizer! And then, lets put up a lot of linking sites to create a clever set of pipelines back to the main bucket full of fertilizer. A person that has studied some facts about micro organisms could get offended by the sharing of such information along with the notion that 'pulsed' antibiotic therapy is a reasonable  'therapy'. In order to understand the flaws in 'pulse' therapy, lets take a look at how such things as MRSA(methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus) develop:http://www.learner.org/courses/biology/textbook/infect/infect_4.html
There is such a treatment as multiple antibiotic therapy for extended periods of time in order to get rid of some heavy duty nasties, but nowhere within the rational scientific community is it acceptable to shorten treatments and allow lapses in time between doses. Seems like a recipe for kill me off quick based on the rational findings and the established treatment modalities of the medically licensed community. Wouldn't it be nice to have a sort of fertilizer filter in one's search engine settings? I haven't figured out how to tweak this little piping system of fertilizer out of my results yet, but one of these days...And yes, I just couldn't resist the urge to point it out and sneer at it some more. Maybe I need an ethics filter? Yes, ethics and fertilizer filters. That would be so nice!